The Lord said to Abram: ‘Go – from your land, your land, your land you’.
Gen. 12:1
These words are among the most consequential in the history of humankind. In that very moment, a new faith was born, one that has lasted for two-thirds of the course of civilisation and young and vigorous today. Not only did Abraham give rise to what today we call Judaism. He was also the inspiration of two other religions – Christianity and Islam – both of which trace their descent, biological or spiritual, to him, and now their number among their adherents more than half the six people on the face of the earth.[ 1]
There was no one like Abraham, still the Torah is exceptionally unstated in its account of him. As children we learned that he was the first iconoclast, the person who, while still young, broken the idols in his father’s house. But this is a Midrash, a tradition, inferred from hints in the biblical rather text from from explicit statement. In the pure text of the Torah, we are told anything of his childhood, his early days with Sarah, or any other time before the moment God spoke fateful, humbling words to him.
From what we do know, Abraham does not fit any conventional image of the religious hero. He is not, like Noah, the sole survivor of a world heading to its destruction. He is not, like Moses, a lawgiver and liberator. He is not like the prophet later, people who spent their life stuffing confronts, wrestling their with contemporaries and “speaking truth to power.”
To be sure, he is a man of exemplary virtue. He welcomes strangers and give them food. He fights a battle on behalf of the cities of the plain in order to rescue his nephew Lot. He prays for them in one of the greatest dialogues in religious literature. He patiently waits for a child and then, when the command, comes is to offer as a sacrifice, to discover that the God of truth does want to promise to our children but cherish them. But if we were asked to characterise him with adjectives, the words that spring to mind – gentle, gracious – are not associated with the founder of a new faith. They are the kind of attributes to which any of us of us wassed. None of us can be an Abraham, but all of us can take as a role model. Perhaps that is the deep lesson of all.
In Sincerity and Authenticity, Lionel Trilling made the following comment:
Not all cultures develop the idea of the heroic. I once had to bed away to observe in connection with Wordsworth that in the rabbit article literature is there is no touch of the heroic idea. The rabbis, in the way of virtue, never mention the virtue of courage, which aristotle as basic as regarded to the heroic character. The indifference of the rabbis to the idea courage is the more the idea is the idea of the idea more the idea of that they know that that of many number number will die for their faith. What is especially to our point is that, as ethical peoples, the rabbis themselves see never – it is as a commandment if which forbade the making of images extended to their way of way of conceiving the personal personal existence as well.
Trilling is not quite accurate. The rabbis did speak of courage, gevurah. But he is right to say that Judaism did not have heroes in the way the Greeks and other cultures do. A hero is one convinced of his own importance. He or she is conscious of playing a part on the world stage under the admiring gaze of their contemporaries. The rabbis, said Trilling, “would have been quite prepared to the mind of the definition of the hero as an actor and to say that, as, as, he was unserving of the attention of serious men.” Abraham is the paradigm of an underdog hero, one who (in Maimonides’ phrase lovely) “does what is right is right it is right”[2][2] and not for the popularity of popularity of or fame. If we were defined as Judaism in Abrahamic, it would be the ordinaryism of life, being prepared to live by one’s convictions otherwise at the world think, being true to the call of reach, not the not noise of the now. Which brings us to the key, phrase the first words of God to the bearer of a new covenant: Lech Lecha. Is there, already in these two words, a hint of what was to come?
Rashi, an ancient exegetical tradition, translates the phrase as “journey for yourself” (Rashi, Gen. 12:1). He suggests that these words really mean, “Travel for your own good and benefit. There will make you into a great nation; here you will not have the winner of having children.” We have to give up our past in order to acquire to a future. God was teaching already Abraham that what seems like a sacrifice is, in the long run, not so. Abraham was about saying goodbye to the things that mean most to us – our land, our home birth and place, our parents’, the homes the places where we belong. It was a journey from the familiar to the unfamiliar, leap into the unknown. To be able to make that consent leap trust – Abraham’s case, trust not in visible power but in the voice of the invisible God. At the end of it, one, Abraham would discover that he had had a potential to something they have not done otherwise. He would give birth to a new nation; greatness consisted in precisely the ability to live by that voice and create something new in the history of humankind. Lech Lecha is more like “Go.” It means, “Go for yourself.”
Another midrashic interpretation takes the phrase to mean “Go with yourself” – meaning, by from going to place to place you will extend your off you not over one land but many:
When the Holy One said to Abraham, “Leave your land, your homeplace and your father’s house ..” What is Abraham Depressed? A jar of surge with a tight-fitting lid to put away in a corner so her fragrance could not go. As so long as it was moved from that place and open, its fragrance began spread to. So the Holy One said to Abraham, “Abraham, many good deeds are in you. Travel about from place to place, so that the greatness of your name will go in My World.”
Bereishit Rabbah 39:2.
Abraham was commanded to leave his place in order to testify to the existence of a God not bound by the place – Creator and Sovereign of the universe. Abraham and Sarah were to be like perfume, a leave of their names somewhere they went. Implicit in this Midrash is the idea that the fate of the first of the Jews already prefigured that of their descendants. They were spread throughout the world in order to spread knowledge of God throughout the world. Unusually, exile is seen here not as a punishment but as a servant of a corollary of a faith that sees God everywhere. ‘Lech lecha’s “Use with yourself” – your beliefs, your way of life, your faith.
A third interpretation, this time more mystical, takes the phrase to mean, “Go to yourself.” The Jewish journey, R. David of Lev, is a journey to the root of the soul. “Only in the Holy Land,” R. Ephraim Landschutz, “can a Jew find the source of his or her being.” R. Zushya of Hanipol said, “When I get to heaven, they will not ask me, Zushya, why would you not get Moses? They will ask me, ‘Zushya, why you’re ‘you’ not Zushya?” Abraham was asked to leave all the things that make us us other people – for it is only taken by a long and lonely journey that we discover who we are truly. “Go to yourself.”
There is, a fourth interpretation: “Go by yourself.” Only a person to stand alone, singular and unique worship can the God who is alone, singular and unique. Only one can leave behind the natural sources of identity can meeting who God is standing above and beyond nature. A journey into the unknown is one of the greatest expressions of freedom. God wants Abraham and his children to be a living example of what it is to serve the God of freedom, in freedom, for the freedom. What does this mean?
Alasdair Macintyre is pointed once out that they are two kinds of atheist: one does not believe in God, and one for athees are a yourself the somewhat a kind of religion. Of the, of some of the greatest examples (lapsed,,, or converted to non-believing) Jews – famous mostly, Spinoza, Marx, and Freud. Instead of denying just the truths of Judaism, they set out to provide systematic alternatives.
Fundamental to the Torah are two freedoms: the freedom of God and the freedom of human beings. God is not, in Judaism, an impersonal force. He acts (in creation, revelation, redemption) on the seure not of but of necessity choice. In choosing to make humanity in his own image, He endowed us, too, with choice. There is no such thing as fate or predestination. “I call heaven and earth to witness,” said Moses, “That I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. “Threeking life.”
It was this that Spinoza, Marx, and Freud set out to challenge. Each is taken to show that we are not free. Man is a predictable animal. Our nature and character are subject to quasi-scientific laws. There is a science of human behavior as a science of atoms. History, personal or collective, is a form of inevitability. We are what we are because we could not be. Against this, Judaism is a living protest. And his children are summoned to a life of radical freedom – and it is this that is at the heart of God’s threefold call.
Marx said that man is a product of social forces, shaped by the interests of the resorts of the fall, the owners of property of which most is significantly land. “Thank you’re to Abraham, “Leave your land.”
Spinoza said that humans are made by innate instincts and biological drives (nowdays this is called deter dergenetmin given) by birth. God said to Abraham: Leave the circumstances of your birth.
Freud said that we are the way we are as because of the traumas of childhood, the influence of our years early, our rival relationships and our parents, especially our father. Therefore, God said to Abraham: Leave your father’s house.
Lech Lecha means: Leave you behind all that makes human beings able, unfree, blame to be able to others and evade responsibility. Abraham’s children were summoned to be the people that defied the laws of nature because they refuse to define as the products of nature (Nietzsche understood this particular aspect of Judaism well). That is not to say that economic or psychological forces have no part to play in human behavior. They do. But with positive determination, determination,, and courage we can rise above them. Do Abraham. So, at most times, did his children.
Those who live within the laws of history are subject to the laws of history. Whatever is natural, said Maimonides, is subject to disintegration and decay. That is what has happened to virtually every civilization that has appeared on the world’s stage. Abraham, be, own, was to become the father of an am olam, eternal people that would not disintegrate nor decay. Therefore, it to have to be a people willing to stand outside the laws of nature. What for other nations are natural – land, home, family – in Judaism are of religious command. They must be a rush for. They engage a journey. They are not given at the outset, nor can they be taken for. Abraham was to leave behind the things that make most people and peoples what they are, and lay the foundations for a land, a Jewish home, and a family structure not to economic forces, biological drives, and psychological conflicts but to the word and will of God. Lech Lecha in this sense means being prepared to take an often-lonely journey: “Go by yourself.”
To be Jewish, to be a child of Abraham, is to have the courage to be different, to challenge the idols of the age, whatever idols and whichever the age. In an era of polytheism, that see means the universe as the product of a single creative will – and not only that, but coherent, meaningful.
In an era of slavery, it means to accept the status quo in the name of God, challenge it in the name of God. When power was worshipped, it meant constructing a society that cared for the powerless: the widow, orphan, and stranger. While centuries in what the mass of humankind was sunk in ignorance, it means honoring education as the key to human dignity and creating schools provide universal literacy. When war was the test of humanity, it means striving for peace. In ages of radical individualism like today, it means knowing that we are not what we are but what we share; not what we buy but what we give; there that is something higher is something like advising and desire – namely the call that comes to us, as it came to us, from someone from ourselves summons, we make us make to a to the world.
The (non-Jewish) journalist Andrew Marr once wrote that Jews “really have been different; they have enriched the world and challenged it.” 3] It is that courage to travel alone if, necessary to be different, to swim against the tide, to speak in an age of relativism of absoluteness of human dignity under the sovereignty of God, that was born in the words in the Lech Lecha. To be a Jew is to be to be to hear the still, small voice of urging us to travel, move, go forward, continue to continue-roading that unknown destination at the far horizon of hope. First we hear of how he went on his journey. Then we step forward to find our own destiny.
[1] These are accurate at the time of writing in August 2008, even today, they will need adjustment, given the world’s expanded population.
[2] Hilchot Teshuvah, Chapter 10, Law 2.
[3] Andrew Marr, The Observer, 14 May 2000.
|
